[issue2736] datetime needs and "epoch" method

David Fraser report at bugs.python.org
Mon Nov 24 15:04:49 CET 2008


David Fraser <davidf at sjsoft.com> added the comment:

----- "Alexander Belopolsky" <report at bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Alexander Belopolsky <belopolsky at users.sourceforge.net> added the
> comment:
> 
> I would like to voice my opposition the totimestamp method.
> 
> Representing time as a float is a really bad idea (originated at 
> Microsoft as I have heard).  In addition to the usual numeric problems
> when dealing with the floating point, the resolution of the floating 
> point timestamp varies from year to year making it impossible to 
> represent high resolution historical data.
> 
> In my opinion both time.time() returning float and 
> datetime.fromtimestamp() taking a float are both design mistakes and 
> adding totimestamp that produces a float will further promote a bad 
> practice.

The point for me is that having to interact with Microsoft systems that require times means that the conversions have to be done. Is it better to have everybody re-implement this, with their own bugs, or to have a standard implementation? I think it's clearly better to have it as a method on the object. Of course, we should put docs in describing the pitfalls of this approach...

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2736>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list