[issue1759169] clean up Solaris port and allow C99 extension modules
John Levon
report at bugs.python.org
Tue Feb 17 15:30:36 CET 2009
John Levon <movement at users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
> However, experience tells that systems can break in surprising ways
> if the system headers are compiled with different defines.
This is indeed a reasonable concern (for which the best solution is
dropping the defines in the Python compile).
> I do feel this restrictiveness of the header files (wrt. C99) is
> arbitrary, and has no use.
Unfortunately, neither you, I, nor Sun can do anything at all about this
fact. I've filed an RFE for you:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6806390
feature_tests.h could be laxer about C99
(It'll take a while to be visible externally.)
Even if this happens, though, it's strictly a workaround: it is still a
bug that Python sets these defines on Solaris: they do not mean what the
Python build thinks they mean. It's effectively a Linux-ism.
> setting _XOPEN_SOURCE had worked fine since Solaris 7.
The particular change we're talking about (C99) went back in 2003:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4760794
4760794 UNIX03: sys/feature_tests.h updates required to support SUSv3
and c99
so Python has been broken by this for all of the Solaris 10 lifecycle.
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list