[issue4258] Use 30-bit digits instead of 15-bit digits for Python integers.
Gregory P. Smith
report at bugs.python.org
Thu Feb 19 03:40:17 CET 2009
Gregory P. Smith <greg at krypto.org> added the comment:
Here are the results from 32-bit x86 on core2 duo gcc 4.0.1 using
pydigits_bestof.py 4000:
30-bit digits (14): 15719 ms
30-bit digits + optimizations (13+ops): 12490 ms
unpatched py3k : 13289 ms
(again, i had to manually add #define PYLONG_DIGIT_SIZE 30 to pyconfig.h
for the longdigit13+optimizations patch).
and pybench runs on the same builds vs unpatched:
30-bit digits (14): -1.4% (slightly slower)
30-bit digits + optimizations (13+ops): -0.2% (insignificant)
My votes:
Obviously use the optimized version (but fix the configure stuff).
+0 for enabling it by default on 32bit builds.
+10 for enabling it by default on 64bit builds.
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4258>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list