[issue1580] Use shorter float repr when possible
Preston Briggs
report at bugs.python.org
Wed Feb 25 19:11:22 CET 2009
Preston Briggs <prestonb at google.com> added the comment:
>> It'd probably have to be touched up a bit.
> This may be an understatement. :-)
Probably so. Nevertheless, it's got to be easier
than approaching the problem from scratch.
And considering that this discussion has been
going on for over a year now, it might be a way to
move forward.
> In the first 50 lines of the 3897-line dtoa.c file, I see this warning:
>
> /* On a machine with IEEE extended-precision registers, it is
> * necessary to specify double-precision (53-bit) rounding precision
> * before invoking strtod or dtoa. [...] */
>
> It seems to me that figuring out how and when to do this, and
> writing and testing the appropriate configure/pyport/whatever
> code, is already a nontrivial task.
I would consider compiling the library with flags appropriate to forcing
64-bit IEEE arithmetic if possible. Another possibility is to explore
gdtoa.c
which is supposed to include code for extended precision, quad precision,
etc.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13176/unnamed
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1580>
_______________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: unnamed
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-bugs-list/attachments/20090225/97b38d90/attachment.txt>
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list