[issue6247] should we include argparse

[Steven Bethard]

Steven Bethard <steven.bethard at gmail.com> added the comment:

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Martin v. Löwis<report at bugs.python.org> wrote:
> It would be useful if several people could confirm that argparse
> is *not* horribly designed.

A totally reasonable request. Anyone willing to evaluate this can take
a look at:

http://argparse.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/argparse.py

It also may help to look at the extensive test suite:

http://argparse.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/test/test_argparse.py

If anyone has specific questions about how something works or how to
extend argparse with new functionality, I'm happy to answer those
questions.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6247>
_______________________________________