[issue6251] c++ extension module implementation guide/example in extending/embedding documentation
John O'Driscoll
report at bugs.python.org
Thu Jun 11 08:39:10 CEST 2009
John O'Driscoll <biggerbumme at yahoo.co.in> added the comment:
I'm aware of Boost without being familiar. I should find out more. I
don't have any reason to think it might not be the better approach.
I guess when I wrote this I was thinking in terms of minimising
dependencies: writing a program that depended only on the standard
libraries of c/c++ and python. In that context, if Boost-python were to
become a part of a stdlib, there'd be no need at all for this. Are there
any plans afoot?
Also, if dependencies are not a problem for your project, Boost might be
the way to go. I won't indulge in any polemic one way or the other. I
just thought a DIY primer might be useful in some contexts. Whether the
official docs is the place for it I don't know.
John O'Driscoll
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6251>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list