[issue400608] just testing

[Daniel Diniz]

Daniel Diniz <ajaksu at gmail.com> added the comment:

Thanks for the feedback, Guido!

gvanrossum wrote:
> You could maintain this as a locally modified version, but a better
> approach would be to make just enough changes to upload.py itself so
> that you can write the rest of this script as a *wrapper* around
> upload.py.

Yes, a wrapper is an option. MvL suggested a patch[1] and for this
initial implementation it makes things simpler. IIUC, in this case
upload.py would need no changes, as we simply populate existing
options with fetched values.

> PS. What do you mean by "wish we could expunge the deleted ones"?  If
> you delete a Rietveld issue it is really gone.  If you merely close it,
> you can still delete it later.  But I'm probably missing something.

Yes, you're missing the fact that you were the one saying  "wish we
could expunge the deleted ones" :)

 upload.py fetched that from http://bugs.python.org/msg32813 because I
told it to:
python static/upload.py -R 400608 -F msg32813

[1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/2009-March/001875.html

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue400608>
_______________________________________