[issue1529353] Squeezer - squeeze large output in the interpreter
Tal Einat
report at bugs.python.org
Mon Mar 30 22:24:46 CEST 2009
Tal Einat <taleinat at users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
"Test needed"? I'll need a bit of guidance on this.
Has there been a change of policy of which I'm not aware, that patches
to IDLE not going to be accepted unless comprehensive tests are included?
Much of IDLE doesn't include tests, e.g. the RPC code. There's a comment
by K.B.K. in the end of rpc.py from September '03 saying we need a
proper test suite for it, and testing that should be simple compared to
testing GUI related functionality.
In any case, if someone can suggest a simple approach to test Squeezer
I'll gladly work it up. As it is, I can think of ways to test certain
functions, but I'm not sure how to approach testing GUI related
functionality (or if I should approach this at all).
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1529353>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list