[issue8354] siginterrupt with flag=False is reset when signal received

Andrew Bennetts report at bugs.python.org
Fri Apr 16 01:29:14 CEST 2010


Andrew Bennetts <spiv at users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:

> I'm not exactly sure how we will know if it is expected to fail,
> though.  I don't think `HAVE_SIGACTION` is exposed nicely to Python
> right now.

It might be useful to have the contents of pyconfig.h exposed as a dict somehow.  Maybe call it sys._pyconfig_h?

A less ambitious change would be to expose just HAVE_SIGACTION as e.g. signal._have_sigaction.

I agree with r.david.murray that we probably don't need to bother unless a buildbot or someone reports that this test fails.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8354>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list