[issue8354] siginterrupt with flag=False is reset when signal received
Andrew Bennetts
report at bugs.python.org
Fri Apr 16 01:29:14 CEST 2010
Andrew Bennetts <spiv at users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
> I'm not exactly sure how we will know if it is expected to fail,
> though. I don't think `HAVE_SIGACTION` is exposed nicely to Python
> right now.
It might be useful to have the contents of pyconfig.h exposed as a dict somehow. Maybe call it sys._pyconfig_h?
A less ambitious change would be to expose just HAVE_SIGACTION as e.g. signal._have_sigaction.
I agree with r.david.murray that we probably don't need to bother unless a buildbot or someone reports that this test fails.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8354>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list