[issue6101] SETUP_WITH

[Benjamin Peterson]

Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> added the comment:

2010/12/4 Thomas Vander Stichele <report at bugs.python.org>:
>
> Thomas Vander Stichele <thomasvs at users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
>
> Maybe I am missing something, but why was it ok for this patch to move EXTENDED_ARGS from 143 to 145 ? I thought the numbers for opcodes were part of the ABI ?

Very much not.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6101>
_______________________________________