[issue9317] Incorrect coverage file from trace test_pickle.py

[Eli Bendersky]

Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> added the comment:

<<<<
Your new patch makes perfect sense, but can you check of regular  
python invocation uses runpy these days. If it does, it may make sense  
to include it in trace at least optionally.
>>>>

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this. Could you please clarify?

<<<<
Also, does this fix the original problem?
>>>>

Alas, no.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9317>
_______________________________________