[issue9317] Incorrect coverage file from trace test_pickle.py

[Alexander Belopolsky]

Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> added the comment:

On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Eli Bendersky <report at bugs.python.org>  
wrote:

>
> Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> <<<<
> Your new patch makes perfect sense, but can you check of regular
> python invocation uses runpy these days. If it does, it may make sense
> to include it in trace at least optionally.
>>>>>
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this. Could you please  
> clarify?
>

Sorry, typing on the phone.  s/of/if/ in my message above. What I mean  
is that as far as I know, when you run a script from command line,  
python loads it using functions in runpy.  Arguably this means that  
these functions should show up in coverage.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9317>
_______________________________________