[issue8999] Add Mercurial support to patchcheck

Antoine Pitrou report at bugs.python.org
Wed Jun 23 21:23:30 CEST 2010


Antoine Pitrou <pitrou at free.fr> added the comment:

> As for Hg support, enough people seem to run mq on top of svn to make
> this a reasonable thing to add now and to change once the transition
> occurs.

Yes, but the question is what workflow it should assume. If you are
running mq for example (or pbranch, or doing local named branches),
using a simple "hg status" of the working copy will not do the right
thing.

(and, by the way, you can't assume mq is the favourite workflow out of
there: I for example use clones + local named branches instead)

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8999>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list