[issue9117] class syntax not fully documented in reference manual

[Mark Dickinson]

Mark Dickinson <dickinsm at gmail.com> added the comment:

It looks like fixing the production list is the easy part (see attached patch):  as far as I can tell, the *syntax* for class definitions is pretty much identical to that for function calls.  (The semantics are different, of course.)  It would be good if someone could check this patch for sanity, though.

The description in that section still needs updating.

----------
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17802/issue9117.patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9117>
_______________________________________