[issue1491804] Simple slice support for list.sort() and .reverse()
R. David Murray
report at bugs.python.org
Thu Sep 23 03:04:33 CEST 2010
R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> added the comment:
In fact, I find the proposed syntax *less* obvious than the slice syntax, for sorted. IOW, I'd be -1 on adding these to sorted. The potentially useful case is between
l[a:b] = sorted(l[a:b})
where the interesting bit is that the sort takes place in place (no memory copy).
I still find the slice syntax clearer :), and it's not clear that the savings of the memory copy for a few programs that use it is worth the added complexity for all other programs. So I concur with Raymond's rejection.
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
More information about the Python-bugs-list