[issue11134] Add missing type slots

Martin v. Löwis report at bugs.python.org
Sun Feb 6 21:26:50 CET 2011


Martin v. Löwis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

> Given the recent multiple additions of "forgotten things" in the ABI,
> wouldn't it be better to mark the ABI experimental so that things can
> get ironed out in 3.2.1? (especially with user feedback after the
> release)

I don't know what would be gained in such a marking, or how the marking
could be carried out.

I assume that uptake of the ABI is slow either way (marked or not),
although you might manage to slow it down further by marking it
experimental. I can't see why that would be desirable.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11134>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list