[issue11135] Redundant doc field in TypeSpec

[Martin v. Löwis]

Martin v. Löwis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

It's the same as the current tp_doc parameter for static type objects, and essentially like any other doc string in the C API. It's owned by the extension module, which must make sure it lives at least as long as the type object.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11135>
_______________________________________