[issue11332] Increase logging/__init__.py coverage to 97%

[Vinay Sajip]

Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk> added the comment:

> OK, but acceptance tests do not need to not try to get higher  test coverage. 
>For instance, for testing disable() simply using it and making  sure the outcome 
>is as expected also works.

> 
> I can understand wanting to  avoid some low-level whitebox testing, but I don't 
>think that precludes getting  better coverage  results.

Well then, it sounds like we're on the same page. I'm not arguing against better 
coverage, just against the low-level whitebox testing elements of Oliver's 
patch. He did welcome comments, after all :-)

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11332>
_______________________________________