[issue10827] Functions in time module should support year < 1900 when accept2dyear = 0

Alexander Belopolsky report at bugs.python.org
Fri Jan 7 21:39:50 CET 2011


Alexander Belopolsky <belopolsky at users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:

Committed in 87829.

I added a year >= 1900 check in time.strftime for now because removing or relaxing this limit should be done in coordination with similar datetime module issue.  See #1777412.

See also python-dev discussion starting at

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-January/107186.html

----------
resolution:  -> fixed
stage: commit review -> committed/rejected
superseder:  -> datetime.strftime dislikes years before 1900
versions: +Python 3.2

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10827>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list