[issue10827] Functions in time module should support year < 1900 when accept2dyear = 0
Alexander Belopolsky
report at bugs.python.org
Fri Jan 7 21:39:50 CET 2011
Alexander Belopolsky <belopolsky at users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
Committed in 87829.
I added a year >= 1900 check in time.strftime for now because removing or relaxing this limit should be done in coordination with similar datetime module issue. See #1777412.
See also python-dev discussion starting at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-January/107186.html
----------
resolution: -> fixed
stage: commit review -> committed/rejected
superseder: -> datetime.strftime dislikes years before 1900
versions: +Python 3.2
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10827>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list