[issue10947] imaplib: Internaldate2tuple and ParseFlags require (and latter returns) bytes arrays; should allow/return str
report at bugs.python.org
Fri Jan 21 07:32:24 CET 2011
Joe Peterson <joe at skyrush.com> added the comment:
These are all good comments. And I agree that the naming of the functions is not good (and the CamelCase).
Overall, yes, it should be made consistent and the types returned and passed in should be appropriate. I did a little experimenting, using more imaplib functions in Python3, and I found the following...
In the case of Internaldate2tuple(), I use it as follows (and I suspect most would do the same):
typ, data = src_box.fetch(src_msg, '(INTERNALDATE)')
...check typ here for error...
src_internal_date = data
src_date_tuple = myInternaldate2tuple(src_internal_date)
So data is a bytes array, returned by the fetch() method, and it is indeed therefore compatible with Internaldate2tuple().
In fact, it seems that the data, in general, is returned as bytes arrays in imaplib. Given that we are dealing with raw email headers and bodies, this is perhaps exactly what should be done. There is some grey area here. For example, for headers, RFC 2047 discusses using special 'encoded-words' that are regular ASCII in, e.g., subjects (but I've encountered a few cases of UTF-8 in headers, even though this is a dubious practice). IMAP flags are ASCII as well.
On the other hand, what you get from fetching pieces of emails are thing that you usually want to deal with as strings (e.g., you will want to do find() and startswith(), etc. on them). But I guess it depends on what is really proper to use for email data.
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
More information about the Python-bugs-list