[issue12026] Support more of MSI api by exposing handles

Mark Mc Mahon report at bugs.python.org
Sun May 8 10:28:51 CEST 2011


Mark Mc Mahon <mtnbikingmark at gmail.com> added the comment:

You can pass it to any function in the MSI SDK through ctypes.

e.g. 

    def ReadStream(record, field):
        buf = (ctypes.c_char * 2048)()
        orig_size = ctypes.sizeof(buf)
        status = 0
        res = []
        while status == 0:
            size = ctypes.c_long(ctypes.sizeof(buf))
            status = msidll.MsiRecordReadStream(
                record.hanlde, field, ctypes.byref(buf), ctypes.byref(size))
            res.append(buf.raw)
            if size.value != orig_size:
                break
        data = "".join(res)
        return data


or any of the other functions not currently implemented in _msi.c
Some of the other important ones (to me at least) are:
 - MsiDatabaseGetPrimaryKeys
 - MsiDatabaseExport
 - MsiDatabaseImport

If the whole MSI SDK is wrapped - then exposing the handles would have no use :).

The alternative I have so far is to re-write _msi.c using ctypes (already done), but I thought it would be better if not all of _msi.c had to be re-implemented.

One alternative patch is to include those extra functions in _msi.c (though I am not sure I have the C skills to achieve that easily - and it may still miss functionality, and it may have even less chance of being accepted)

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12026>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list