[issue12196] add pipe2() to the os module
Ross Lagerwall
report at bugs.python.org
Sat May 28 13:33:27 CEST 2011
Ross Lagerwall <rosslagerwall at gmail.com> added the comment:
>> Also, the pure python implementation of subprocess for posix can now >> be updated to use pipe2 if it exists (previously on _posixsubprocess.c
>> used it).
> I don't understand the last part :-)
> What do you suggest?
Perhaps, os.pipe2 can be used if available, then a modified version of _posixsubprocess.cloexec_pipe without the check for pipe2 could be used as a fallback.
I'm not sure why there exists both a python and c implementation.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12196>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list