[issue13285] signal module ignores external signal changes

[Charles-François Natali]

Charles-François Natali <neologix at free.fr> added the comment:

>> Could it return an opaque wrapper object, rather than just the raw
>> address? Something like:
>
> Are you suggesting that it would return either a Python function object or a
> wrapper object?

I think it would be an ugly kludge. I don't like the idea of passing
around an opaque "blob" just for that purpose (I mean, it's really a
corner case).
So I'm -1.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13285>
_______________________________________