[issue11849] glibc allocator doesn't release all free()ed memory
Charles-François Natali
report at bugs.python.org
Fri Nov 25 09:17:07 CET 2011
Charles-François Natali <neologix at free.fr> added the comment:
> For the record, this seems to make large allocations slower:
>
> -> with patch:
> $ ./python -m timeit "b'x'*200000"
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 27.2 usec per loop
>
> -> without patch:
> $ ./python -m timeit "b'x'*200000"
> 100000 loops, best of 3: 7.4 usec per loop
>
Yes, IIRC, I warned it could be a possible side effect: since we're
now using mmap() instead of brk() for large allocations (between 256B
and 32/64MB), it can be slower (that's the reason adaptive mmap
threadshold was introduced in the first place).
> More surprising is that, even ignoring the allocation cost, other operations on the memory area seem more expensive:
Hum, this it strange.
I see you're comparing 3.2 and default: could you run the same
benchmark on default with and without the patch ?
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11849>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list