[issue14489] repr() function link on the built-in function documentation is incorrect

[R. David Murray]

R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> added the comment:

This is only a problem in the 2.7 docs.

I tried adding a .. py:currentmodule:: builtins directive to the page, hoping that would make all unqualified links local, but it didn't work.  I think the fix will require someone with more Sphinx-foo than I have.

----------
nosy: +r.david.murray
type:  -> behavior

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14489>
_______________________________________