[issue11060] distutils2 sdist does not complain about version that is not PEP 386 compliant

[Rik Poggi]

Rik Poggi <poggi.ricky at gmail.com> added the comment:

Thanks, I'll wait! In the meanwhile I couldn't help to dig a little deeper and found that the Metadata class is currently logging a warning. Should the commands raise something when there's a warning in strict mode?

I was playing with the check command about this when I stumbled in an odd looking piece of code in metadata.py with a FIXME note: "# FIXME this rejects UNKNOWN, is that right?" (see attached file). I'm not sure how, but it seems related to a "random" (I couldn't find any pattern) log message that sometimes give: 

"'UNKNOWN': '0.4.5dev' is not a valid version (field 'Version')"

and others:

"'Name': '0.4.5dev' is not a valid version (field 'Version')"

(I had this with consecutive execution from a simple test that I wrote in test_command_check, with metadata['name'] == 'Name').

I hoped to not have wasted your time, but I thought that it could may be related to this bug since it seems that the version gets rightfully (but strangefully) warned as not valid from this "middle-layer" check point.

----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25141/metadata_set_extract.py

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11060>
_______________________________________