[issue13959] Re-implement parts of imp in pure Python

Brett Cannon report at bugs.python.org
Sun Apr 15 22:12:38 CEST 2012


Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> added the comment:

OK, so I have started to check this stuff in, but I think it's best to do it piecemeal. Going forward I would like to commit in units of functions being replaced, and prioritize stuff that cuts out C code (e.g. the load_*() methods, find_module(), etc.). That way it's clear that progress is being made. Obviously the best way to tell if code is hanging on just because of imp is to comment out the interface code and see what your compiler complains about in terms of dead code (or at least clang is good at this).

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13959>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list