[issue13697] python RLock implementation unsafe with signals

STINNER Victor report at bugs.python.org
Wed Jan 4 04:15:53 CET 2012


STINNER Victor <victor.stinner at haypocalc.com> added the comment:

> This affects the python implementation of RLock only.

In the issue #13550, it was discussed to remove completly the logging machinery from the threading module. If we remove it, we don't need the Python implementation of RLock.

We already removed the Python implementation of subprocess.Popen._execute_child() in Python 3.3 because of issues with fork, signals and threads.

----------
nosy: +haypo

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13697>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list