[issue13697] python RLock implementation unsafe with signals
STINNER Victor
report at bugs.python.org
Wed Jan 4 04:15:53 CET 2012
STINNER Victor <victor.stinner at haypocalc.com> added the comment:
> This affects the python implementation of RLock only.
In the issue #13550, it was discussed to remove completly the logging machinery from the threading module. If we remove it, we don't need the Python implementation of RLock.
We already removed the Python implementation of subprocess.Popen._execute_child() in Python 3.3 because of issues with fork, signals and threads.
----------
nosy: +haypo
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13697>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list