[issue2636] Adding a new regex module (compatible with re)

[Alex Gaynor]

Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor at gmail.com> added the comment:

So, to my reading of teh compatibility PEP this cannot be added wholesale,
unless there is a pure Python version as well.  However, if it replaced re
(read: patched) it would be valid.

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Nick Coghlan <report at bugs.python.org>wrote:

>
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> As part of the PEP 408 discussions, Guido approved the addition of 'regex'
> in 3.3 (using that name, rather than as a drop-in replacement for re) [1,2]
>
> That should greatly ease the backwards compatibility concerns, even if it
> isn't as transparent an upgrade path.
>
> [1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115961.html
> [2] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115962.html
>
> ----------
> nosy: +ncoghlan
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2636>
> _______________________________________
>

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2636>
_______________________________________