[issue14136] Simplify PEP 409 command line test and move it to test_cmd_line_script
Ethan Furman
report at bugs.python.org
Tue Mar 27 23:05:18 CEST 2012
Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> added the comment:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Hah, I've been dealing with Python's regression test suite for 8+ years and there are still cases where I don't understand the rationale for testing things a particular way (beyond "it must have seemed like a good idea at the time"). It has a lot more historical cruft than the standard library does :)
>
> The "proper" location for a particular test can be a bit of a coin toss in many cases, but one useful guide (which applies in this case) is to try to avoid adding *new* standard library dependencies to a test module if there's an alternate suitable location that already has those dependencies.
I just checked the patch and it still applies cleanly with the two
effected tests passing.
Nick, any chance of getting this checked in and closed?
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14136>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list