[issue14731] Enhance Policy framework in preparation for adding email6 policies as provisional

[R. David Murray]

R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> added the comment:

I checked the indent fix into the wrong branch in my repo.  It's in the other patch.  I could fix that if desired.

The reason for making the base class public is to allow subclassing.  Perhaps that is not needed for Compat32, though.

I don't think that the policy argument obsoletes the existing method options.  It is easier to write:

  gen.flatten(msg, linesep='\r\n')

than it is to write

  gen.flatten(msg, policy=msg.policy.clone(linesep='\r\n'))

That is, when you want to make a change in just one method call, as opposed to globally, then the existing arguments are more convenient.

That said, a section in What's New describing when it might be a good idea to move to a global policy setting vs using the existing arguments may be worthwhile.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14731>
_______________________________________