[issue14673] add sys.implementation

[Eric Snow]

Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> added the comment:

I've just attached 4 patches, one for each of the likeliest implementations.  All 4 ran the test suite successfully.

In my mind, the "simple namespace" one is the best fit.  However, it involves adding a new built-in type (though a private one).  If that is too controversial or too much new stuff to iron out for 3.3, I'd be okay with any of the others.  In reality I'd like to see that new namespace type added to Python, but that's a proposition I'll take up elsewhere.  :)

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14673>
_______________________________________