[issue20092] type() constructor should bind __int__ to __index__ when __index__ is defined and __int__ is not

[R. David Murray]

R. David Murray added the comment:

Nah, splitting it doesn't seem worth it unless you think the patch won't make it in.

(Not that I looked at it earlier, but he patch on the issue doesn't look like what you just posted here...and here there's a typo: shuld).

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20092>
_______________________________________