[issue16850] Atomic open + close-and-exec
Antoine Pitrou
report at bugs.python.org
Thu Jan 3 21:02:08 CET 2013
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
> How about two options, like 'e' for guaranteed atomic CLOEXEC and 'E'
> for CLOEXEC with or without atomic ops?
Why would you want that? Best effort is sufficient.
Also, I'm not sure why "e".
----------
nosy: +pitrou
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16850>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list