[issue16850] Atomic open + close-and-exec

Antoine Pitrou report at bugs.python.org
Thu Jan 3 21:02:08 CET 2013


Antoine Pitrou added the comment:

> How about two options, like 'e' for guaranteed atomic CLOEXEC and 'E'
> for CLOEXEC with or without atomic ops?

Why would you want that? Best effort is sufficient.
Also, I'm not sure why "e".

----------
nosy: +pitrou

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16850>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list