[issue19725] Richer stat object

[Philip Jenvey]

Philip Jenvey added the comment:

I can't find the paper trail of what I originally thought was a "consensus" or even that many clear pronouncements about it, but I recall Nick being originally opposed to it but he later changed his mind, you can see his approval here:

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-May/125809.html

'It's also quite likely the "rich stat object" API will be pursued for 3.5'

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-November/130582.html

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-November/130588.html

Antoine seems ok w/ it, encouraging others to make it happen:

https://mail.python.org/pipermail//python-dev/2013-September/128708.html

You can probably find a bit more discussion within those threads

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19725>
_______________________________________