[issue20687] Change in expectedFailure breaks testtools

[Larry Hastings]

Larry Hastings added the comment:

So here's the thing.  It only works in Python 3.3 because testtools depends on internal implementation details of unittest, specifically a private exception ("unittest.case._UnexpectedSuccess").  The public interface still works fine.  So I don't think this is a regression.  If testtools is willing to release hacks depending on undocumented internal behavior, I don't think it's unreasonable for them to rework their hack to support Python 3.4.

That said, it might be nice to not break testtools if we can avoid it.  Antoine: would it be reasonable to rework the implementation of subTest in a way that permitted us to revert the changes to expectedFailure?

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20687>
_______________________________________