[issue20104] expose posix_spawn(p)

Gregory P. Smith report at bugs.python.org
Wed Jan 1 22:17:39 CET 2014


Gregory P. Smith added the comment:

Unless it could replace the fork+exec code path in its entirety, which I do not believe is possible, I see posix_spawn() as a distraction and additional maintenance burden with no benefit.

http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7999959899/functions/posix_spawn.html

Read the RATIONALE section.  The posix_spawn API was not created to make subprocess creation easier (i'd argue that it is the same burden to setup a proper call to posix_spawn as it is to do everything right for fork and exec).

One notable thing posix_spawn() does not support: setsid() (start_new_session=True) of the child process.  Obviously it also couldn't handle the arbitrary preexec_fn but preexec_fn is in general considered harmful.

----------
priority: normal -> low

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20104>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list