[issue21419] Use calloc() instead of malloc() for int << int (lshift)

Josh Rosenberg report at bugs.python.org
Fri May 2 23:00:55 CEST 2014


Josh Rosenberg added the comment:

Given your benchmarks show improvements (you posted while I was typing my last comment), I'm guessing it's just the posted patch that's wrong, and your local changes actually use use_calloc?

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21419>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list