[issue26487] Machine value for fat PowerPC build

[Ned Deily]

Ned Deily added the comment:

Thanks for your suggestion.  Unfortunately, at the time support for OS X universal builds was added, it was not anticipated that there would be a need for that particular combination of architectures, i.e. just PPC-32 and PPC-64, and, to the best of my knowledge, this is the first time this request has come up.  The universal platform names defined in get_platform_osx have become an external standard and are used elsewhere in the Python ecosphere, in particular, in pip and in binary wheels.  So adding a new universal platform name at this time for the combination of two long obsolete architectures is probably not a good idea.  Options: either build separate single-architecture versions, or add "i386" to use the existing "fat3" definition, or continue to apply the patch yourself.

----------
resolution:  -> wont fix
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26487>
_______________________________________