[issue40046] Increase test coverage of the random module

[Raymond Hettinger]

Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> added the comment:

I'm against this doc change.  While factually true, it is irrelevant and distracting to most users.  We do not need to test and document every implementation detail, nor should we.

----------
resolution:  -> rejected
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40046>
_______________________________________