[Python-checkins] CVS: python/nondist/peps pep-0200.txt,1.4,1.5
Fred L. Drake
python-dev@python.org
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 21:12:44 -0700
Update of /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps
In directory slayer.i.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv27923
Modified Files:
pep-0200.txt
Log Message:
Do not start non-heading content on the first character of the line (after
the header).
Index: pep-0200.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps/pep-0200.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -C2 -r1.4 -r1.5
*** pep-0200.txt 2000/07/25 14:11:19 1.4
--- pep-0200.txt 2000/07/26 04:12:42 1.5
***************
*** 18,30 ****
Tentative Release Schedule
! Aug. 14: All 2.0 PEPs finished / feature freeze
! Aug. 28: 2.0 beta 1
! Sep. 29: 2.0 final
Guidelines for submitting patches and making changes
! Use good sense when committing changes. You should know what we mean
! by good sense or we wouldn't have given you commit privileges <0.5
! wink>. Some specific examples of good sense include:
- Do whatever the dictator tells you.
--- 18,30 ----
Tentative Release Schedule
! Aug. 14: All 2.0 PEPs finished / feature freeze
! Aug. 28: 2.0 beta 1
! Sep. 29: 2.0 final
Guidelines for submitting patches and making changes
! Use good sense when committing changes. You should know what we
! mean by good sense or we wouldn't have given you commit privileges
! <0.5 wink>. Some specific examples of good sense include:
- Do whatever the dictator tells you.
***************
*** 44,76 ****
to someone for review.
! Any significant new feature must be described in a PEP and approved
! before it is checked in.
! Any significant code addition, such as a new module or large patch,
! must include test cases for the regression test and documentation. A
! patch should not be checked in until the tests and documentation are
! ready.
!
! If you fix a bug, you should write a test case that would have caught
! the bug.
!
! If you commit a patch from the SF Patch Manager or fix a bug from the
! Jitterbug database, be sure to reference the patch/bug number in the
! CVS log message. Also be sure to change the status in the patch
! manager or bug database (if you have access to the bug database).
!
! It is not acceptable for any checked in code to cause the regression
! test to fail. If a checkin causes a failure, it must be fixed within
! 24 hours or it will be backed out.
!
! All contributed C code must be ANSI C. If possible check it with two
! different compilers, e.g. gcc and MSVC.
!
! All contributed Python code must follow Guido's Python style guide.
! http://www.python.org/doc/essays/styleguide.html
!
! It is understood that any code contributed will be released under an
! Open Source license. Do not contribute code if it can't be released
! this way.
Accepted and completed
--- 44,77 ----
to someone for review.
! Any significant new feature must be described in a PEP and
! approved before it is checked in.
! Any significant code addition, such as a new module or large
! patch, must include test cases for the regression test and
! documentation. A patch should not be checked in until the tests
! and documentation are ready.
!
! If you fix a bug, you should write a test case that would have
! caught the bug.
!
! If you commit a patch from the SF Patch Manager or fix a bug from
! the Jitterbug database, be sure to reference the patch/bug number
! in the CVS log message. Also be sure to change the status in the
! patch manager or bug database (if you have access to the bug
! database).
!
! It is not acceptable for any checked in code to cause the
! regression test to fail. If a checkin causes a failure, it must
! be fixed within 24 hours or it will be backed out.
!
! All contributed C code must be ANSI C. If possible check it with
! two different compilers, e.g. gcc and MSVC.
!
! All contributed Python code must follow Guido's Python style
! guide. http://www.python.org/doc/essays/styleguide.html
!
! It is understood that any code contributed will be released under
! an Open Source license. Do not contribute code if it can't be
! released this way.
Accepted and completed
***************
*** 116,120 ****
Small optimization achieved by using the code object's lnotab
instead of the SET_LINENO instruction. Uses code rewriting
! technique (that Guido's growns on) to support debugger, which
uses SET_LINENO.
--- 117,121 ----
Small optimization achieved by using the code object's lnotab
instead of the SET_LINENO instruction. Uses code rewriting
! technique (that Guido's frowns on) to support debugger, which
uses SET_LINENO.