[Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Modules cPickle.c,2.41,2.42
Guido van Rossum
python-dev@python.org
Tue, 9 May 2000 14:14:53 -0400 (EDT)
Update of /projects/cvsroot/python/dist/src/Modules
In directory eric:/projects/python/develop/guido/src/Modules
Modified Files:
cPickle.c
Log Message:
New version from Jim Fulton to fix a problem that Eric Raymond ran
into. Jim writes:
The core dump was due to a C decrement operation
in a macro invocation in load_pop. (BAD)
I fixed this by moving the decrement outside
the macro call.
I added a comment to load_pop and load_mark
to document the fact that cPickle separates the
unpickling stack into two separate stacks, one for
objects and one for marks.
I also moved some increments out of some macro
calls (PyTuple_SET_ITEM and PyList_SET_ITEM).
This wasn't necessary, but made me feel better. :)
I tested these changes in *my* cPickle, which
doesn't have the new Unicode stuff.
Index: cPickle.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/python/dist/src/Modules/cPickle.c,v
retrieving revision 2.41
retrieving revision 2.42
diff -C2 -r2.41 -r2.42
*** cPickle.c 2000/05/03 23:44:31 2.41
--- cPickle.c 2000/05/09 18:14:50 2.42
***************
*** 250,255 ****
l=self->length-start;
UNLESS (r=PyTuple_New(l)) return NULL;
! for (i=start, j=0 ; j < l; )
! PyTuple_SET_ITEM(r,j++,self->data[i++]);
self->length=start;
--- 250,255 ----
l=self->length-start;
UNLESS (r=PyTuple_New(l)) return NULL;
! for (i=start, j=0 ; j < l; i++, j++)
! PyTuple_SET_ITEM(r, j, self->data[i]);
self->length=start;
***************
*** 264,269 ****
l=self->length-start;
UNLESS (r=PyList_New(l)) return NULL;
! for (i=start, j=0 ; j < l; )
! PyList_SET_ITEM(r,j++,self->data[i++]);
self->length=start;
--- 264,269 ----
l=self->length-start;
UNLESS (r=PyList_New(l)) return NULL;
! for (i=start, j=0 ; j < l; i++, j++)
! PyList_SET_ITEM(r, j, self->data[i]);
self->length=start;
***************
*** 3105,3113 ****
UNLESS ((len=self->stack->length) > 0) return stackUnderflow();
if ((self->num_marks > 0) &&
(self->marks[self->num_marks - 1] == len))
self->num_marks--;
! else
! Py_DECREF(self->stack->data[--(self->stack->length)]);
return 0;
--- 3105,3122 ----
UNLESS ((len=self->stack->length) > 0) return stackUnderflow();
+ /* Note that we split the (pickle.py) stack into two stacks,
+ an object stack and a mark stack. We have to be clever and
+ pop the right one. We do this by looking at the top of the
+ mark stack.
+ */
+
if ((self->num_marks > 0) &&
(self->marks[self->num_marks - 1] == len))
self->num_marks--;
! else {
! len--;
! Py_DECREF(self->stack->data[len]);
! self->stack->length=len;
! }
return 0;
***************
*** 3434,3437 ****
--- 3443,3451 ----
load_mark(Unpicklerobject *self) {
int s;
+
+ /* Note that we split the (pickle.py) stack into two stacks, an
+ object stack and a mark stack. Here we push a mark onto the
+ mark stack.
+ */
if ((self->num_marks + 1) >= self->marks_size) {