[Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Misc NEWS,1.277,1.278
Guido van Rossum
gvanrossum@users.sourceforge.net
Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:47:00 -0700
Update of /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Misc
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv30043
Modified Files:
NEWS
Log Message:
Reword the text on the demise of __dynamic__ somewhat, correcting a
typo.
Index: NEWS
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Misc/NEWS,v
retrieving revision 1.277
retrieving revision 1.278
diff -C2 -d -r1.277 -r1.278
*** NEWS 2001/10/15 22:03:32 1.277
--- NEWS 2001/10/16 00:46:57 1.278
***************
*** 6,16 ****
- New-style classes are now always dynamic (except for built-in and
! extension types). There was no longer a performance penalty, and I
no longer see another reason to keep this baggage around. One relic
! remains: the __dict__ or a new-style class is a read-only proxy.
! You must set the class's attribute to modify. As a consequence, the
__defined__ attribute of new-style types no longer exists, for lack
of need: there is once again only one __dict__ (although in the
! future a __cache__ may be resurrected in its place).
- C.__doc__ now works as expected for new-style classes (in 2.2a4 it
--- 6,17 ----
- New-style classes are now always dynamic (except for built-in and
! extension types). There is no longer a performance penalty, and I
no longer see another reason to keep this baggage around. One relic
! remains: the __dict__ of a new-style class is a read-only proxy; you
! must set the class's attribute to modify it. As a consequence, the
__defined__ attribute of new-style types no longer exists, for lack
of need: there is once again only one __dict__ (although in the
! future a __cache__ may be resurrected with a similar function, if I
! can prove that it actually speeds things up).
- C.__doc__ now works as expected for new-style classes (in 2.2a4 it