[Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Doc/lib email.tex,1.3,1.3.2.1 lib.tex,1.191,1.191.2.1

[Fred L. Drake]

Update of /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Doc/lib
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv22923/lib

Modified Files:
      Tag: r22a4-branch
	email.tex lib.tex 
Log Message:
Sync with documentation head.

Index: email.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Doc/lib/email.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.3.2.1
diff -C2 -d -r1.3 -r1.3.2.1
*** email.tex	2001/09/26 22:21:52	1.3
--- email.tex	2001/09/27 20:41:06	1.3.2.1
***************
*** 9,12 ****
--- 9,13 ----
      generating email messages, including MIME documents.}
  \moduleauthor{Barry A. Warsaw}{barry@zope.com}
+ \sectionauthor{Barry A. Warsaw}{barry@zope.com}
  
  \versionadded{2.2}
***************
*** 183,195 ****
  either been added or removed.  The semantics of some of the methods
  have also changed.  For the most part, any functionality available in
! \module{mimelib} is still available in the \module{email} package,
  albeit often in a different way.
  
  Here is a brief description of the differences between the
! \module{mimelib} and the \module{email} packages, along with hints on
  how to port your applications.
  
  Of course, the most visible difference between the two packages is
! that the package name has been changed to \module{email}.  In
  addition, the top-level package has the following differences:
  
--- 184,196 ----
  either been added or removed.  The semantics of some of the methods
  have also changed.  For the most part, any functionality available in
! \module{mimelib} is still available in the \refmodule{email} package,
  albeit often in a different way.
  
  Here is a brief description of the differences between the
! \module{mimelib} and the \refmodule{email} packages, along with hints on
  how to port your applications.
  
  Of course, the most visible difference between the two packages is
! that the package name has been changed to \refmodule{email}.  In
  addition, the top-level package has the following differences:
  
***************
*** 250,254 ****
  subparts for each header block in the delivery status
  notification\footnote{Delivery Status Notifications (DSN) are defined
! in \rfc{1894}}.
  
  The \class{Generator} class has no differences in its public
--- 251,255 ----
  subparts for each header block in the delivery status
  notification\footnote{Delivery Status Notifications (DSN) are defined
! in \rfc{1894}.}.
  
  The \class{Generator} class has no differences in its public

Index: lib.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Doc/lib/lib.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.191
retrieving revision 1.191.2.1
diff -C2 -d -r1.191 -r1.191.2.1
*** lib.tex	2001/09/11 16:59:42	1.191
--- lib.tex	2001/09/27 20:41:06	1.191.2.1
***************
*** 216,219 ****
--- 216,227 ----
  \input{netdata}                 % Internet Data Handling
  \input{libformatter}
+ \input{email}
+ \input{emailencoders}
+ \input{emailexc}
+ \input{emailgenerator}
+ \input{emailiter}
+ \input{emailmessage}
+ \input{emailparser}
+ \input{emailutil}
  \input{librfc822}
  \input{libmimetools}
***************
*** 284,287 ****
--- 292,297 ----
  \input{libdis}
  \input{distutils}
+ 
+ \input{compiler}                % compiler package
  
  %\input{libamoeba}              % AMOEBA ONLY