[Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Doc/lib libstdtypes.tex, 1.160, 1.161

[akuchling at users.sourceforge.net]

Update of /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Doc/lib
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv25966

Modified Files:
	libstdtypes.tex 
Log Message:
Typo fix; use 'in-place' instead of 'inplace'

Index: libstdtypes.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.160
retrieving revision 1.161
diff -C2 -d -r1.160 -r1.161
*** libstdtypes.tex	6 Aug 2004 18:43:09 -0000	1.160
--- libstdtypes.tex	6 Aug 2004 18:55:09 -0000	1.161
***************
*** 538,542 ****
  
  \item[(6)] If \var{s} and \var{t} are both strings, some Python
! implementations such as CPython can usally perform an inplace optimization
  for assignments of the form \code{\var{s}=\var{s}+\var{t}} or
  \code{\var{s}+=\var{t}}.  When applicable, this optimization makes
--- 538,542 ----
  
  \item[(6)] If \var{s} and \var{t} are both strings, some Python
! implementations such as CPython can usually perform an in-place optimization
  for assignments of the form \code{\var{s}=\var{s}+\var{t}} or
  \code{\var{s}+=\var{t}}.  When applicable, this optimization makes
***************
*** 545,549 ****
  preferrable to use the \method{str.join()} method which assures consistent
  linear concatenation performance across versions and implementations.
! \versionchanged[Formerly, string concatenation never occurred inplace]{2.4}
  
  \end{description}
--- 545,549 ----
  preferrable to use the \method{str.join()} method which assures consistent
  linear concatenation performance across versions and implementations.
! \versionchanged[Formerly, string concatenation never occurred in-place]{2.4}
  
  \end{description}