[Python-checkins] r43657 - peps/trunk/pep-0000.txt peps/trunk/pep-3001.txt
Georg Brandl
g.brandl at gmx.net
Thu Apr 6 14:37:50 CEST 2006
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> This is a good start. One thing I think should be addressed when
> fixing the names of modules is the new module name should be made
> available in 2.x in order to facilitate forward compatibility. This
> may apply to public API changes as well (renaming methods). It sucks
> to start cluttering the API, but I don't see a better alternative.
I'll add that to the PEP.
> It would be nice to freshen all code and ensure greater consistency of
> names, including packages, modules, classes, functions, methods, and
> identifiers. Maybe we should run pylint over the code to ensure new
> code is conformant?
pychecker: yes, please.
pylint: only with a carefully crafted config file. In the default mode,
it spews out too many warnings.
> It would also be nice to ensure docstrings are present and consistent.
> Perhaps provide more doctests too which can serve as examples.
Yep.
Georg
More information about the Python-checkins
mailing list