[Python-checkins] r46603 - python/trunk/Lib/test/test_struct.py
Thomas Wouters
thomas at python.org
Sun Jun 4 01:51:13 CEST 2006
On 6/3/06, Neal Norwitz <nnorwitz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/2/06, martin.blais <python-checkins at python.org> wrote:
> > Author: martin.blais
> > Date: Fri Jun 2 15:03:43 2006
> > New Revision: 46603
> >
> > Modified:
> > python/trunk/Lib/test/test_struct.py
> > Log:
> > Fixed struct test to not use unittest.
>
> Shoot, I had hoped you would go the other way and convert all the old
> test cases to use unittest. :-)
Heh, my reaction was both "huh?" and "yay" at the same time. I thought
unittest was still preferred for the stdlib testsuite? I don't particularly
see the benefits of unittest myself, although I admit it's a _tad_ cleaner
than most of the non-unittest scripts the stdlib had before. However, having
written a few tests with py.test, in particular test-generators, well,
unittest's just cumbersome ;-P
I'm not arguing for (or against) py.test, just wondering what the support
and opposition for changing the policy would be like ;-)
--
Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me
spread!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/attachments/20060604/bd1484dc/attachment.htm
More information about the Python-checkins
mailing list