[Python-checkins] r43475 - peps/trunk/pep-0205.txt peps/trunk/pep-0219.txt peps/trunk/pep-0282.txt peps/trunk/pep-0298.txt peps/trunk/pep-0313.txt peps/trunk/pep-0330.txt

[georg.brandl]

Author: georg.brandl
Date: Fri Mar 31 12:38:30 2006
New Revision: 43475

Modified:
   peps/trunk/pep-0205.txt
   peps/trunk/pep-0219.txt
   peps/trunk/pep-0282.txt
   peps/trunk/pep-0298.txt
   peps/trunk/pep-0313.txt
   peps/trunk/pep-0330.txt
Log:
it's -> its



Modified: peps/trunk/pep-0205.txt
==============================================================================
--- peps/trunk/pep-0205.txt	(original)
+++ peps/trunk/pep-0205.txt	Fri Mar 31 12:38:30 2006
@@ -50,8 +50,8 @@
     Circular references
 
         - DOMs require a huge amount of circular (to parent & document
-          nodes), but these could be eliminated using a weak
-          dictionary mapping from each node to it's parent.  This
+          nodes) references, but these could be eliminated using a weak
+          dictionary mapping from each node to its parent.  This
           might be especially useful in the context of something like
           xml.dom.pulldom, allowing the .unlink() operation to become
           a no-op.
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@
 
     "Phantom" references are a little different; unlike weak and soft
     references, the referent is not cleared when the reference is
-    added to it's queue.  When all phantom references for an object
+    added to its queue.  When all phantom references for an object
     are dequeued, the object is cleared.  This can be used to keep an
     object alive until some additional cleanup is performed which
     needs to happen before the objects .finalize() method is called.

Modified: peps/trunk/pep-0219.txt
==============================================================================
--- peps/trunk/pep-0219.txt	(original)
+++ peps/trunk/pep-0219.txt	Fri Mar 31 12:38:30 2006
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
     / microthreads.
 
     Generally, when a recursive call is transformed into a loop, a bit
-    of extra bookkeeping is required. The loop will need to keep it's
+    of extra bookkeeping is required. The loop will need to keep its
     own "stack" of arguments and results since the real stack can now
     only hold the most recent. The code will be more verbose, because
     it's not quite as obvious when we're done. While Stackless is not

Modified: peps/trunk/pep-0282.txt
==============================================================================
--- peps/trunk/pep-0282.txt	(original)
+++ peps/trunk/pep-0282.txt	Fri Mar 31 12:38:30 2006
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@
 
         def setLoggerClass(klass): ...
 
-    The passed class should be a subclass of Logger, and it's __init__
+    The passed class should be a subclass of Logger, and its __init__
     method should call Logger.__init__.
 
 

Modified: peps/trunk/pep-0298.txt
==============================================================================
--- peps/trunk/pep-0298.txt	(original)
+++ peps/trunk/pep-0298.txt	Fri Mar 31 12:38:30 2006
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
     The object must be unlocked again by releasing the buffer if it's
     no longer used by calling another function in the locked buffer
     interface.  If the object never resizes or reallocates the buffer
-    during it's lifetime, this function may be NULL.  Failure to call
+    during its lifetime, this function may be NULL.  Failure to call
     this function (if it is != NULL) is a programming error and may
     have unexpected results.
 

Modified: peps/trunk/pep-0313.txt
==============================================================================
--- peps/trunk/pep-0313.txt	(original)
+++ peps/trunk/pep-0313.txt	Fri Mar 31 12:38:30 2006
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 
     This PEP is rejected.  While the majority of Python users deemed this
     to be a nice-to-have feature, the community was unable to reach a
-    concensus on whether nine should be represented as IX, the modern
+    consensus on whether nine should be represented as IX, the modern
     form, or VIIII, the classic form.  Likewise, no agreement was
     reached on whether MXM or MCMXC would be considered a well-formed
     representation of 1990.  A vocal minority of users has also requested

Modified: peps/trunk/pep-0330.txt
==============================================================================
--- peps/trunk/pep-0330.txt	(original)
+++ peps/trunk/pep-0330.txt	Fri Mar 31 12:38:30 2006
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
     allow Python bytecode to execute arbitrary C-level machine
     instructions or to modify private, internal data structures in the
     interpreter.  If used cleverly this could subvert any form of
-    security policy an application may want to apply to it's objects.
+    security policy an application may want to apply to its objects.
 
     Practically, it would be difficult for a malicious user to
     "inject" invalid bytecode into a PVM for the purposes of