[Python-checkins] r53815 - peps/trunk/pep-0000.txt peps/trunk/pep-0226.txt peps/trunk/pep-0328.txt peps/trunk/pep-3102.txt peps/trunk/pep-3105.txt peps/trunk/pep-3106.txt peps/trunk/pep-3107.txt peps/trunk/pep-3109.txt peps/trunk/pep-3110.txt

[Georg Brandl]

Neal Norwitz schrieb:
> On 2/18/07, georg.brandl <python-checkins at python.org> wrote:
>> Modified: peps/trunk/pep-0328.txt
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- peps/trunk/pep-0328.txt     (original)
>> +++ peps/trunk/pep-0328.txt     Sat Feb 17 19:42:37 2007
>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>  Version: $Revision$
>>  Last-Modified: $Date$
>>  Author: Aahz <aahz at pythoncraft.com>
>> -Status: Accepted
>> +Status: Final
>>  Type: Standards Track
>>  Python-Version: 2.4, 2,5, 2.6, 2.7
>>  Content-Type: text/x-rst
> 
> Should 328 be final given that there are more things that need to be
> done in 2.6 (was this change made to the 2.6 code?) and 2.7?

I thought that now that the roadmap is set out and will be followed, the
PEP can be marked as final. I'll revert that if "Final" is not appropriate
herefore.

Georg