[Python-checkins] r65668 - python/trunk/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst
brett.cannon
python-checkins at python.org
Thu Aug 14 07:55:18 CEST 2008
Author: brett.cannon
Date: Thu Aug 14 07:55:18 2008
New Revision: 65668
Log:
Fix markup for various binary operation examples where the operands were bolded
and the operator was made literal, leading to non-valid reST. Changed to have
the entire expression just be a literal bit of text.
Modified:
python/trunk/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst
Modified: python/trunk/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst
==============================================================================
--- python/trunk/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst (original)
+++ python/trunk/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst Thu Aug 14 07:55:18 2008
@@ -1983,7 +1983,7 @@
These methods are called to implement the binary arithmetic operations (``+``,
``-``, ``*``, ``//``, ``%``, :func:`divmod`, :func:`pow`, ``**``, ``<<``,
``>>``, ``&``, ``^``, ``|``). For instance, to evaluate the expression
- *x*``+``*y*, where *x* is an instance of a class that has an :meth:`__add__`
+ ``x + y``, where *x* is an instance of a class that has an :meth:`__add__`
method, ``x.__add__(y)`` is called. The :meth:`__divmod__` method should be the
equivalent to using :meth:`__floordiv__` and :meth:`__mod__`; it should not be
related to :meth:`__truediv__` (described below). Note that :meth:`__pow__`
@@ -2028,7 +2028,7 @@
``&``, ``^``, ``|``) with reflected (swapped) operands. These functions are
only called if the left operand does not support the corresponding operation and
the operands are of different types. [#]_ For instance, to evaluate the
- expression *x*``-``*y*, where *y* is an instance of a class that has an
+ expression ``x - y``, where *y* is an instance of a class that has an
:meth:`__rsub__` method, ``y.__rsub__(x)`` is called if ``x.__sub__(y)`` returns
*NotImplemented*.
@@ -2065,10 +2065,10 @@
in-place (modifying *self*) and return the result (which could be, but does
not have to be, *self*). If a specific method is not defined, the augmented
operation falls back to the normal methods. For instance, to evaluate the
- expression *x*``+=``*y*, where *x* is an instance of a class that has an
+ expression ``x += y``, where *x* is an instance of a class that has an
:meth:`__iadd__` method, ``x.__iadd__(y)`` is called. If *x* is an instance
of a class that does not define a :meth:`__iadd__` method, ``x.__add__(y)``
- and ``y.__radd__(x)`` are considered, as with the evaluation of *x*``+``*y*.
+ and ``y.__radd__(x)`` are considered, as with the evaluation of ``x + y``.
.. method:: object.__neg__(self)
@@ -2206,12 +2206,12 @@
*
- In *x*``+``*y*, if *x* is a sequence that implements sequence concatenation,
+ In ``x + y``, if *x* is a sequence that implements sequence concatenation,
sequence concatenation is invoked.
*
- In *x*``*``*y*, if one operator is a sequence that implements sequence
+ In ``x * y``, if one operator is a sequence that implements sequence
repetition, and the other is an integer (:class:`int` or :class:`long`),
sequence repetition is invoked.
More information about the Python-checkins
mailing list